Legal Opinion

Clark v. Unum Group

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided November 28, 2022No. 4:20-cv-04013Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION EDWARD CLARK, 4:20-CV-04013-KES Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S vs. SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL UNUM GROUP, THE PAUL REVERE [Docket No. 101] LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. INTRODUCTION This matter is pending before the court on plaintiff’s second motion to compel the production of documents. Docket No. 101. Defendants resist the motion, and plaintiff has filed a reply. Docket Nos. 114 & 118. This matter has been referred to this magistrate judge for determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Thompson v. NixCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API