John Russell Webster, Cross-Appellants v. The City of Houston, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-Appellee John Russell Webster, et al., has petitioned for rehearing and, thereupon, that we limit the remand to the issue of damages. Upon reconsideration we conclude that the Websters should not be penalized, nor their attorneys or the trial judge faulted, for the jury instructions that lacked the refinements of our formulation to govern the imposition of municipal liability stated in. the prior en banc opinion of this case (735 F.2d 838, 841) and our recent writing in Bennett v. City of Slidell, 728 F.2d 762 (5th Cir.1984) (en banc). From the proof made, this jury could have found…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John Russell Webster, Cross-Appellants v. The City of Houston, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Henry J. Bennett, Jr. v. City of Slidell, Gerry Hinton, B.E. McDaniel Nunzio Giordano, and Patrick J. BerriganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Magallanes Investment, Inc. v. Circuit Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
3Cited by67 opinions
- Leffall v. Dallas Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Charles Carter v. District of Columbia, Maurice Turner, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department Charles Carter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Grandstaff v. City of BorgerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Norman Jett v. Dallas Independent School District and Frederick ToddCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Crowder v. SinyardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.