Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Bogorff v. Scott
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 13, 2017No. CASE NO.: SC17-1155Published
1ConcurrencePariente, J.
This is yet another chapter in which the ill-fated protagonists, the petitioners in this case, who had healthy citrus trees destroyed by the State in 2002 and 2003, continue to be thwarted in their attempt to obtain full and just compensation.1 Rather than reaching a final conclusion in the saga that Judge May so aptly titled the “Book of Citrus Canker,” Bogorff v. Florida Dep’t of Agriculture & Consumer Services, 191 So.3d 512 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016), the legislative appropriations for the full amounts of the final judgments were vetoed by the Governor, prompting the petition filed in this Court,
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tampa-Hillsborough Expressway v. AGWSSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Joint Ventures, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. MendezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Toby Bogorff, Robert Bogorff, Beth Garcia, Ronald Garcia, Robert Pearce, Barbara Pearce and Timothy Donald Farley, etc. v. Florida Department of Agriculture And Consumer Services and The Florida Commissioner AgricultureDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016