Legal Opinion
Dirton v. McCarthy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 16, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiff’s case, which had been pending more than two years, was discontinued at the annual call of the docket on May 6, 1960. No request for a continuance was filed and no motion to restore to the docket was made under the rules then in effect. Practice Book § 193 (Cum. Sup. 1959), § 194. The action of the court in discontinuing the case was a final judgment. Glazer v. Rosoff, 120 Conn. 120, 122, 179 A. 407.
On September 9, 1960, the plaintiff moved to restore the case to the docket, but since the term in which the judgment had been rendered had expired, the motion was denied. Foley v.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foley v. George A. Douglas & Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Glazer v. RosoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Jarvis v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. Sangivanni & Sons v. F. M. Floryan & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Lake Garda Co. v. Lake Garda Improvement Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Sussman v. Riverbank Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Dirton v. McCarthyPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1962
- Dirton v. McCarthyConnecticut Superior Court · 1962