Legal Opinion

Leban v. Range Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1926No. 25,135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for personal injuries received by plaintiff while a passenger on a motor bus owned by defendant Range Rapid Transit Company and driven by defendant Pernu. After a verdict for plaintiff, defendants moved in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial. The motion for judgment was ■ granted and plaintiff appeals.

The seats of the bus extended the full width of the body. They were reached by passengers through doors opening on the right side. The doors were hinged on the front side so that in opening they swung outward and forward and in closing, backward and inward.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. McCurrie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. OverallTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Silva v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. L'Hommedieu v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mame Wildes v. Jesse WildesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. Ball v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Underdahl v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API