Elliott v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
Appeal is taken from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas,1 2summarily entered holding that appellees are relieved from any obligation under an automobile liability insurance policy because of the insured’s breach of the cooperation clause of the insurance contract.3 The judgment of the trial court was declaratory under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201 and diversity jurisdiction is admitted, 28 U.S. C.A. § 1332(a).
The determinative facts are not in dispute. Herman E. Johnston, an insured under the subject policy, was the driver of an…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- State Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. of Columbus v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Kindervater v. Motorists Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Jameson v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Buckner v. BucknerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Elliott v. The Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957