Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1957No. 5590PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appeal is taken from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas,1 2summarily entered holding that appellees are relieved from any obligation under an automobile liability insurance policy because of the insured’s breach of the cooperation clause of the insurance contract.3 The judgment of the trial court was declaratory under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2201 and diversity jurisdiction is admitted, 28 U.S. C.A. § 1332(a).

The determinative facts are not in dispute. Herman E. Johnston, an insured under the subject policy, was the driver of an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Broderick Wood Products Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. State Automobile Mut. Ins. Co. of Columbus v. YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  3. Kindervater v. Motorists Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Jameson v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Buckner v. BucknerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Elliott v. The Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API