Legal Opinion

People v. Dominick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 2008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), rendered February 3, 2006, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts), robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly admitted a recording of the complainant’s 911 emergency call under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule. The statement qualified as an *506excited…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. People v. QuevasNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. GanttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ConnellyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. People v. SpencerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. DockeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. People v. CoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API