Legal Opinion

Jager v. Astrue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 23, 2008No. 07-35211PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Joan Jager appeals the district court’s denial of her motion under the Equal Access to Justice Act for attorneys’ fees accrued in connection with proceedings that led to a prior decision by this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412; Jager v. Barnhart, 192 Fed.Appx. 589 (9th Cir.2006). We reverse.

We review a district court’s denial of attorneys’ fees under the EAJA for abuse of discretion. See Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 559, 108 S.Ct. 2541, 101 L.Ed.2d 490 (1988). A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its ruling on “an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Corbin v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Shafer v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gallagher v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API