Jager v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ***
Joan Jager appeals the district court’s denial of her motion under the Equal Access to Justice Act for attorneys’ fees accrued in connection with proceedings that led to a prior decision by this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412; Jager v. Barnhart, 192 Fed.Appx. 589 (9th Cir.2006). We reverse.
We review a district court’s denial of attorneys’ fees under the EAJA for abuse of discretion. See Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552, 559, 108 S.Ct. 2541, 101 L.Ed.2d 490 (1988). A district court abuses its discretion when it bases its ruling on “an erroneous view of the law or on a clearly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Corbin v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Shafer v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gallagher v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021