State v. Bienstock
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On certiorari. On demurrer to indictments. Indictment No. 139 is in the following words: “The grand inquest of the State of New Jersey in and for the body of the county of Hudson, upon their respective oath, present, that since the year eighteen hundred and fifty six continuously up to the date of the presentation of this indictment, the principal two political parties in the United States of America have been and still are commonly known and designated as the Republican…
Read the full summary
On certiorari. On demurrer to indictments. Indictment No. 139 is in the following words: “The grand inquest of the State of New Jersey in and for the body of the county of Hudson, upon their respective oath, present, that since the year eighteen hundred and fifty six continuously up to the date of the presentation of this indictment, the principal two political parties in the United States of America have been and still are commonly known and designated as the Republican party and the Democratic party; that, since said first mentioned date continuously up to the date of the presentation of…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Voorhees, J.
Two indictments for conspiracy were returned against the defendants by the grand jury. To each a general demurrer was filed and thereafter writs of certiorari removed them into tins court for the determination of the questions arising upon the demurrers.
The first indictment, known as No. 139, consisting of a single count, has been above set forth in extenso. The other indictment, No. 169, consists of four counts, the first of which is tlie same as No. 139, being founded on precisely the same facts. The second count concededly cannot be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State v. WoodruffSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Hopper v. StackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Smith v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- State v. RowleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- State v. Aircraft Supplies, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- State v. Continental Purchasing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Tucker v. State Board of Alcoholic ControlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. McFeelyHudson County Superior Court · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.