Architectural Decorating Co. v. Shaw
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gridley
On September 14, 1931, complainant recovered a judgment in the circuit court of Cook county for $4,932.49, against Stacey J. Shaw on his judgment note. After execution had been returned “no property found and no part satisfied,” and by virtue of section 49 of the Chancery Act (Cahill’s St. 1931, ch. 22, Ü 49, p. 244), complainant, on September 28, 1931, filed a creditor’s bill against Shaw and the Ralph Sollitt & Sons Construction Co. (hereinafter called the Sollitt Co.) as defendants. Personal service was had upon the Sollitt Co., but none upon Shaw, who was a nonresident of Illinois. He did…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. National Exchange Bank of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Morgan v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
- Third National Bank v. NorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Paterson & Edey Lumber Co. v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Warner v. MettlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Bayonne v. PalmerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Schmalfeld v. CassadyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940