Jenkins v. Einstein
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois
1Opinion of the Court
BLODGETT. District Judge.
The whole case centers around this transaction, the complainant alleging that it was fraudulent: 1st. Because it was made with intent to hinder, delay and defraud the creditors of Pollard. 2d. Because Pollard was imposed upon as to the amount of indebtedness held by Rich against him and against the firm of R. M. Whipple & Co. 3d. Because Rich occupied a confidential relation to Pollard as his attorney, and took advantage of that relation to impose upon him. 4th. That if the conveyances are valid for any purpose, they are in the nature of security for the actual…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McArtee v. EngartIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vansickle v. Wells, Fargo & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1900