Legal Opinion

Falk v. Wolfsohn

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 28, 1894Published

Appeal from sixth district court. Action by Benjamin J. Falk against Henry Wolfsohn to recover for services rendered and goods furnished. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

This action was brought to recover , for services rendered, and goods furnished, as indicated on the following bill:

Mr. Henry Wolfsohn, 331 East 14th Street.

May 16th, 1893. Making plates for etching Miss Van Stosch........$40 00

500 prints of same................................................ 40 00

Making.........'............................................. $80 00

The negotiations were begun orally, in an interview between the defendant and the plaintiff’s manager. Some details, such as time, price, etc., were not settled, and the following letters were subsequently exchanged:

“April 26, ’93.
“…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall v. . LauderdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Beach v. . Raritan Delaware Bay R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Buck v. AmidonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API