Legal Opinion

Poole v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1938No. 8 Div. 685PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The original affidavit upon which the warrant of arrest was predicated contained two counts. However, upon the trial of this case in the lower court the conviction of appellant was rested upon count 2 of the affidavit, which eliminated from consideration all questions pertaining to count 1. Said count 2 is as follows: “Count 2. Affiant further charges that within twelve months before the making of this affidavit, and in Morgan County, Alabama, Ben Poole did refuse to permit D. J. Garrett, a duly authorized agent of the State Tax Commission, to examine the records of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. City of Bessemer v. EidgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. Holman v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  4. Redd v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Poole v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API