Pruke v. South Park Foundry & Machine Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Eamsey county, Willis, J., refusing a new trial after a verdict for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Personal injury action, in which plaintiff had a verdict. On appeal it is claimed that the evidence fails to disclose any negligence on the part of the defendant; that it was not made to appear from the evidence that the negligence alleged was the cause of the injury; and also, if neither of these positions is sustainable, that it was clearly shown that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence which would prevent a recovery. We do not feel it necessary to discuss these contentions at any great length. The cause upon all these questions was clearly and fairly submitted to the jury in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Groff v. Duluth Imperial Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brooks v. De Soto Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Olson v. Seldovia Salmon Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Columbia Box & Lumber Co. v. DrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
- Waggoner v. PorterfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Aurora Boiler Works v. ColliganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.