Legal Opinion

People v. Tifft

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 20, 1976Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for change of venue denied. Memorandum: It does not appear on this application that a fair and impartial trial cannot be had in Jefferson County. Since the case has not yet progressed to the voir dire of potential jurors, we deem this application premature (People v Hatch, 46 AD2d 721). We further note that the District Attorney of Jefferson County did not personally appear to oppose the defendant’s motion to change the venue of this action, failed to file papers in opposition to defendant’s application and took no position. A district attorney has an obligation to appear and answer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HatchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  2. People v. PitsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  3. People v. HolcombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. People v. HoustonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API