Legal Opinion

K & M La Botica Pharm., Inc. v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided October 4, 2006No. Nos. 10500-99, 17346-99, 17725-99, 8134-00Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

K & M LA BOTICA PHARMACY, INCORPORATED, ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent *

K & M La Botica Pharm., Inc. v. Comm'r

Nos. 10500-99, 17346-99, 17725-99, 8134-00

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2006-214; 2006 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 218; 92 T.C.M. (CCH) 322;

October 4, 2006, Filed

K & M La Botica Pharm., Inc. v. Comm'r, T.C. Memo 2005-277, 2005 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 278 (T.C., 2005)

Larry M. Bakman and Ronald S. Marks, for petitioners.

Ric D. Hulshoff, Loren B. Mark, Ronald S. Chun, Angelique M. Neal, and Daniel M. Whitley, for respondent.

Swift, Stephen J.

J. STEPHENSWIFT

SUPPL…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wichita Term. El. Co. v. Commissioner of Int. R.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  2. Clayton v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994
  3. Mendes v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2003
  4. Cloes v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API