Legal Opinion · Dissent

McNeil v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1991No. 915SC37Published

1Dissent

Judge Eagles

dissenting.

I agree that there is sufficient evidence to submit the issue of the defendant’s negligence to the jury. However, I disagree with that portion of the majority’s opinion which holds that the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent as a matter of law.

The majority attempts to distinguish the instant case from Meadows v. Lawrence, 75 N.C. App. 86, 330 S.E.2d 47, affirmed, 315 N.C. 383, 337 S.E.2d 851 (1985), because of factual dissimilarities. In doing so, the majority overlooks the sound legal principles applied in Meadows, which are equally applicable here. In Meadows,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garmon v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Price v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Meadows v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Hughes v. GraggCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Thornton v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API