Garlick v. Karger
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee-county: D. TI. Johnson, Circuit Judge. They argued that the claim of the appellant was duly made and filed. First Nat. Bank v. Haekett, 61 Wis. 335, 346, 347; Bradley v. Oowen, 19 Eed. Eep. 295. There was no warrant for striking it from the files. They contended that the appellant, representing the interest of a partner, could not prove up her claim in competition with the creditors. Gibbs v. Humphrey, 91 Wis.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee-county: D. TI. Johnson, Circuit Judge. They argued that the claim of the appellant was duly made and filed. First Nat. Bank v. Haekett, 61 Wis. 335, 346, 347; Bradley v. Oowen, 19 Eed. Eep. 295. There was no warrant for striking it from the files. They contended that the appellant, representing the interest of a partner, could not prove up her claim in competition with the creditors. Gibbs v. Humphrey, 91 Wis. Ill, 115; Thayer v. Humphrey, id. 276, 288.
1Opinion of the CourtPinney, J.
This was an appeal from an order of the circuit court for the county of Milwaukee In the matter of the assignment of Morris Speiser and Sigmund Bing, denying the motion of the appellant for a reference and allowance of her claim filed against the assignors, and striking her claim from the files.
Morris Speiser and Sigmund Bing, copartners doing business as the firm of Speiser, Bing & Co., made a voluntary assignment to the respondent for the benefit of their creditors, which was duly filed, and notice given to 'creditors to present their claims. The appellant filed a claim, founded upon a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thayer v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Blakely v. SmockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
- Gibbs v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895