Samuel L. Hobbs, Jr. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

NAJAM, Judge.

Statement of the Case

[1] Samuel L. Hobbs, Jr. appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition to modify sentence. Hobbs raises two issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion when it denied his petition. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

[2] The facts underlying Hobbs’ convictions were stated by this court in his direct appeal:

In the fall of 2003, Hobbs met L.M. at work. Early in 2004, they became romantically involved. Throughout their relationship Hobbs lived in various locations and, while he never lived with…