State v. Ward
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
*254 Where defendant and defense counsel reached an impasse as to whether to cross-examine the State's witness on an issue of sample contamination, we affirm the trial court's ruling that it would be improper for the attorney to pursue a frivolous line of questioning. And where, as defendant concedes, our laws do not support a jury instruction for mistake of age or consent on facts such as these, we overrule defendant's argument.
On 15 July 2013, a Mecklenburg County grand jury indicted defendant Stephen Lamont Ward on two counts of statutory rape of a person thirteen, fourteen, or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. AliSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. PenningtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. BunchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017