Briones v. State

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for attempted rape. Defendant brings forward two grounds of error. The first is that a prospective juror was questioned on voir dire outside the presence of the defendant.

This Court is allowed to review only those matters which appear in the *118record. Williams v. State, 485 S.W.2d 274, 275 (Tex.Crim.App.1972); Hobbs v. State, 433 S.W.2d 700 (Tex.Crim.App.1968). There is nothing in the record to indicate defendant was absent during any part of the voir dire.

Tex.Code Crim.Pro.Ann. § 33.03 (Supp. 1980-1981), in pertinent part, provides:

“.…