Legal Opinion
Zuern v. Tate
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 7, 1996No. C-1-92-771PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND DECISION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF THE ANTITER-RORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996 (PUB.L. NO 104-132, 110 STAT. 1214)
MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
In this habeas corpus ease Petitioner William Zuern seeks relief from his conviction and sentence of death in the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court. On April 24, 1996, between sessions of his evidentiary hearing in this case, Congress adopted and the President signed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (the “Act”) (Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214). The Court requested and the parties have filed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Jamison v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
- Troy A. Ashmus v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Henderson v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- Scott v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.