Wampold v. E. Eric Guirard & Associates
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
We are asked to determine whether, under Louisiana law, the phrase “gross proceeds of recovery” in a standard-form, contingency-fee contract includes future, post-judgment disability benefits. Concluding that it does not, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
The present dispute over legal fees arises out of Thomas Pittenger’s representation of Mervin Wampold in a lawsuit against Wampold’s insurance provider, Paul Revere. Wampold suffered serious injuries in a car accident in 1998; he filed a claim under his insurance policy, which provided for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baker v. MacLay Properties Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Borden, Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Golz v. Children's Bureau of New Orleans, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- On-Site Fuel Service, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021