Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Dehart

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 2018No. NOS.: 27587/27678Published

1ConcurrenceTucker, J.

{¶ 21} I agree that under the circumstances of this case the trial court had the obligation to either allow Dehart to withdraw his guilty plea or, upon the withdrawal motion being overruled, to impose the agreed upon sentence. State v. Walton , 2 Ohio App.3d 117, 440 N.E.2d 1225 (10th Dist. 1981). I write separately to note that a defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea, made after the parties, with the court's imprimatur, enter into a sentencing agreement, could be, under different circumstances, considered an anticipatory repudiation of the sentencing contract *1271that would allow the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State v. CallowayOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API