Legal Opinion

Farrell v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In error. Argued at November Term, 1891, before Beasley, Chief Justice, and Justices Depue’and Van Syckel.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the Mercer County Quarter Sessions upon an indictment of which the following is a copy:

“ Mercer Oyer and Terminer and General Jail Delivery,
“ January Term, 1891.
“ Mercer County, to wit — The grand inquest of the State of New Jersey, in and for the body of the county of Mercer, upon their respective oath—
“ Present, that John Farrell, late of the city, of Trenton, in the said county of Mercer, on the fifth day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred, and ninety-one, with force…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CrouchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Ross v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hall v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Rowan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922
  5. State v. HugginsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API