Legal Opinion

Attridge v. Cencorp Division of Dover Technologies International, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 30, 1987No. Nos. 249, 250, Dockets 87-7479, 87-7505PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

The American jury system, Alexis De Tocqueville observed, is “as direct and as extreme a consequence of the sovereignty *114of the people as universal suffrage.” Accordingly, the sanctity of the jury room is among the basic tenets of our system of justice. Inquiries into the thought processes underlying a verdict have long been viewed as dangerous intrusions into the deliberative process. They undermine the finality of verdicts and invite fraud and abuse. We thus prevent jurors from impeaching their verdict to guard the jury’s special place in our democratic…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Tyrone B. Larkins v. Russell G. Oswald, Commissioner of Corrections of New York StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Wheatley v. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andrulonis v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1989
  2. Patrick C. Attridge and Joyce Attridge v. Cencorp Division of Dover Technologies International, Inc., Cencorp Division of Dover Technologies International, Inc., Third-Party v. Sykes Datatronics, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Shadoan v. CITIES OF GOLD CASINONew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Shadoan v. CITIES OF GOLD CASINONew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API