Duncan v. Pindell
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
*330OPINION of the Court, by
Judge Owsujy.
This suit was brought in the court below by Pindell upon a promissory note executed by Duncan to David Williamson*
Yo leafed felt him-feif bound ⅛ ^Vafe ¡¡e not re. cover oftbema, áer h¡m ¡ncomI petent ¾ ioalfo ⅛”0„01. to°pay the maker if he ó <⅝⅜⅛ ⅛⅜ one who give* currency to * c^noth^ t?cciycd as a witness to In. not aPPiy ⅛ tender.the wit-nes* lnc°“P«-fafts, unless ha b? ⅛⅞⅛
The trial was had in that court on -an issue to a plea of accord and satisfaction^ alleged to have been made by Duncan with Williamson before notice of the assignment to Pindell.
To…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Nathan E. Hooper, Louisa J. Hooper, and Amanda E. Hooper, Minors, by Absalom Fowler, Their Next Friend, in Error v. Jacob ScheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Taylor v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846
- Commonwealth v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835
- Matheny v. WestfallIndiana Supreme Court · 1838