Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Pindell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 21, 1816PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*330OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Owsujy.

This suit was brought in the court below by Pindell upon a promissory note executed by Duncan to David Williamson*

Yo leafed felt him-feif bound ⅛ ^Vafe ¡¡e not re. cover oftbema, áer h¡m ¡ncomI petent ¾ ioalfo ⅛”0„01. to°pay the maker if he ó <⅝⅜⅛ ⅛⅜ one who give* currency to * c^noth^ t?cciycd as a witness to In. not aPPiy ⅛ tender.the wit-nes* lnc°“P«-fafts, unless ha b? ⅛⅞⅛

The trial was had in that court on -an issue to a plea of accord and satisfaction^ alleged to have been made by Duncan with Williamson before notice of the assignment to Pindell.

To…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nathan E. Hooper, Louisa J. Hooper, and Amanda E. Hooper, Minors, by Absalom Fowler, Their Next Friend, in Error v. Jacob ScheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Taylor v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1846
  3. Commonwealth v. GoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835
  4. Matheny v. WestfallIndiana Supreme Court · 1838

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API