Legal Opinion

In re a Care & Protection Summons

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 26, 2002PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C.J.

At issue in this appeal are two judgments of civil contempt entered by a judge in the Juvenile Court Department attendant in a care and protection proceeding. The Department of Social Services (department) sought temporary custody of a newborn infant of the mother and father, the appellants in this case. See G. L. c. 119, § 24. The parents refused to comply with summonses to bring their infant to court claiming, in circumstances we shall describe, that the mother had suffered a miscarriage and that there was no child to bring before the judge for identification.1 After evidentiary hearings…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. RylanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. King v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. BouknightSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Krapf v. KrapfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. In Re Antj. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Adoption of DarlaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  4. Adoption of NorbertMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  5. Rivera v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API