Legal Opinion

Cull v. Brennan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 1926No. 25,026PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, O. J.

Plaintiff and defendant were associates in business. They ceased to be such. In connection therewith plaintiff gave his promissory notes to defendant for $6,000. The complaint say® that in consideration for such notes defendant agreed not to engage in the real estate business in Minneapolis and that he also agreed to. refrain from circulating the story that he had lost money by reason of being associated with plaintiff. It then alleges that defendant had on repeated occasions told divers persons the story- that he had agreed not to tell. Plaintiff now appeals from an order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowers v. SchulerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Todd v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Lee v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. Hart v. Lincoln National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wells-Dickey Trust Co. v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API