Mazzarella v. Whelan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
In this action of criminal conversation the trial judge entered a nonsuit because the statement of claim averred defendant had sexual intercourse with plaintiff’s wife “on or about September 7th, 1921,” while the proofs showed the intercourse did not take place on that date, but on August 26th or 27th.
In Gardner v. Madeira, 2 Yates 466, a criminal conversation action, tried before the Supreme Court at nisi prius, plaintiff declared that defendant on the first of January, 1796, and at divers other times from thence until the first of November following had…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnston v. DisbrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Commonwealth v. BlankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baird v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Bowles v. American Distilling Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1945
- Stairs v. StairsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Stephen v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
- Bell v. Gaston, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County1942