Legal Opinion

Citroen Cars Corp. v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbeitel, J.

In a proceeding (CPLR art. 78) to review a tax deficiency assessment by the New York City Finance Administrator, there are cross appeals. The assessments arose out of the petitioner importer’s failure to pay the city franchise tax measured by gross receipts from wholesale and retail sales of imported automobiles. The Federal Constitution immunizes imports from local taxation, and the Supreme Court has held *303that the immunity continues while the import remains in its original form (U. S. Const., art. I, § 10, cl. 2; Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. [25 U. S.] 419). The issue is whether the importer…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. May v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. City of Houston and Houston Independent School District v. Standard-Triumph Motor Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  2. Nederlandse Draadindustrie NDI B v. v. Grand Pre-Stressed Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1979
  3. Wages v. Michelin Tire CorporationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  4. Wilson v. County of WakeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API