Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Elliott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 24, 1997No. 2-96-229-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Kevin Eugene Elliott appeals the trial court’s denial of his pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. In two points of error, he complains that (1) the trial court abused its discretion in ordering, as a condition of his bond, that an interlock device be installed in his automobile; and (2) that article 17.441 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which authorizes the device, is unconstitutional. We overrule appellant’s points of error and affirm the trial court’s denial of his application for writ of habeas corpus.

Appellant was arrested on September 3, 1995 for driving…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Ex Parte RubacCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Tharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety v. SchaejbeTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Estrada v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ex parte ShiresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Burson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2006
  3. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Ex Parte Alonso Islas Sampiero v. ., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2025
  5. Ex Parte German Sebastian Nunez v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API