Legal Opinion

Redner v. City of Tampa

Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

Decided May 11, 1990No. Case No. 89-15392 (County Court Case Nos. 89-7511; 89-7512, 89-7513, 89-7914)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RICHARD A. LAZZARA, Circuit Judge.

The Appellants stand convicted of violating the adult use provisions of Chapter 43 A of the Tampa Zoning Code. See Sections 43A-197 and 43A-219. They have mounted a multi-pronged attack on the constitutional and legal validity of these provisions in an effort to overturn *58their convictions.1 The Court has carefully reviewed their contentions and determines that it is appropriate to address only one issue2 —was it required by law that the adult use provisions of Chapter 43A of the Tampa Zoning Code be enacted in accordance with the notice…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. MacHado v. MusgroveDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Ellison v. City of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  4. Daytona Leisure Corp. v. City of Daytona BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Alachua County v. Eagle's Nest Farms, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API