Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Chandler

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 22, 1958No. 5-1716PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

This litigation relates to the probation of a will made by W. M. Tatum March 31, 1954. Mr. Tatum, a widower at the time, died on February 24, 1957 at the age of 86, leaving three sons and one daughter. Appellee, May Belle Chandler, is the daughter and two of the sons are J. W. and James L. Tatum, the appellants. The other son is Auda L. Tatum.

The trial court admitted the will to probate, and appellants here seek a reversal on three grounds, to-wit: One, the will was not executed according to law; Two, the testator lacked mental capacity, and; Three, undue…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDaniel ad. v. CrosbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1858
  2. Orr v. LoveSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Shippen v. ShippenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. McWilliams v. NeillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. Parette v. IveySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hiler v. CudeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  2. Short v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Daley v. BoroughsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Hollingsworth v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. Short v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API