Department of Industrial Relations v. Haynes
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
We are called upon to review an opinion of the Court of Appeals which on appeal to it affirmed the judgment of the circuit court holding that appellee was entitled to unemployment benefits under Alabama law. Title 26, section 205 et seq. The circuit court tried the case without a jury as’ provided in section 221, Title 26, Code. Ex parte Miles, 248 Ala. 386, 27 So.2d 777; Henderson v. Department of Industrial Relations, 252 Ala. 239, 40 So.2d 629.
Appellee was denied his claim for benefits by the board’s deputy. Section 216, Title 26, Code. He appealed to the administrative appeals tribunal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Henderson v. Department of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Ex Parte MilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Alabama Mills, Inc. v. BrandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Department of Industrial Relations v. WallAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Andala Co. v. GanusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Department of Industrial Relations v. SavageAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
- Avondale Mills v. BurnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Greene v. Department of Industrial RelationsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
- Zac Smith Stationery Co. v. ReynoldsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.