Legal Opinion

Salter v. Sutherland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1901Published

Replevin by Marvin R. Salter, administrator of the estate of Julia E. Sutherland, deceased, against Daniel M. Sutherland. A judgment for defendant was affirmed March 6, 1900 (123 Mich. 225). On defendant’s motion for leave to move the circuit court for a modification of the judgment entry.

1Opinion of the Court

Montgomery, O. J.

One Marvin R. Salter, as administrator of the estate of Julia E. Sutherland, brought an action of replevin in the circuit court for Gratiot county against the defendant. The case was tried in that court, 'and on the 3d day of February, 1899, a verdict was rendered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. The journal entry of verdict and judgment, as appears upon the record, reads as follows:

“ That the said defendant did not unlawfully detain the goods and chattels mentioned in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath in his declaration in this cause alleged, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davidson v. GunsollyMichigan Supreme Court · 1850
  2. Steere v. VanderbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Salter v. SutherlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Simmons v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Whitney v. HydeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API