Legal Opinion

Parmele v. Mathews

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1963Published

1Opinion of the Court

233 Or. 616 (1963)

379 P.2d 868

PARMELE

v.

MATHEWS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued March 6, 1962.

Reargued January 8, 1963.

Reversed and remanded March 20, 1963.

Thomas E. Brownhill, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Riddlesbarger, Pederson, Brownhill & Ingerson, Eugene.

W.P. Mumford, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Thompson, Mumford & Woodrich, Eugene.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is a child-custody contest that was tried as a guardianship…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kropp v. ShepskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. People ex rel. Portnoy v. StrasserNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton HomeIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. SIMONS ET UX v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1961

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API