Koerper & Co. v. Unitel International, Inc.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
DONNELLY, Judge.
This ease was transferred here by the Western District of the Court of Appeals for resolution of a conflict between Hawkins v. Hawkins, 533 S.W.2d 634 (Mo.App.1976) and Link v. Ise, 716 S.W.2d 805 (Mo.App.1986). Mo. Const, art. V, § 10.
The question is: When may an amended petition relate back to the filing of an original petition so as to save a plaintiff’s cause of action from the bar of a statute of limitations?
In Arpe v. Mesker Brothers Iron Company, 323 Mo. 640, 648, 19 S.W.2d 668, 670 (1929) this Court said: “The general rule is that an amendment will not have such effect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McDaniel v. LovelaceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Laux v. Motor Carriers Council of St. Louis, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Arpe v. Mesker Brothers Iron Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Hawkins v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Miller v. WernerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Mary Plubell, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Merck & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Drury Displays, Inc. v. Board of Adjustment of City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
- Centerre Bank of Kansas City National Ass'n v. AngleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Halupa v. HalupaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Wilson v. P.B. Patel, M.D., P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.