Tony Hatchett v. State of Indiana

PYLE, Judge.

Statement of the Case

Appellant/Defendant, Tony Hatchett (“Hatchett”), appeals his two convictions of Class D felony invasion of privacy 1 which were based on his violation of a protective order and a no-contact order. He objected to one of the trial court’s final jury instructions at trial, arguing that it misled the jury on the law regarding invasion of privacy. The trial court tendered the instruction over Hatchett’s objection, and now on appeal he argues that the trial court improperly instructed the jury. We conclude that the trial court did not improperly instruct the jury…