Amato v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Court of Claims (Christopher Mega, J.), entered July 22, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the plaintiffs’ causes of action under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment granted and the plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) dismissed.
There is no dispute as to the relevant facts here and the questions raised were ripe for determination on summary judgment. We find that the facts clearly show…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Misseritti v. Mark IV Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Staples v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kyle v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- John v. BaharestaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Portillo v. Roby Anne Development, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Dias v. StahlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Mercado v. TPT Brooklyn Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.