Harper v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was indicted and convicted for the grand larceny of five calves belonging to Harold C. Bryan. Sentence was ten years' imprisonment. On appeal the defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdict because: (1) The only evidence of the identity and ownership of the stolen calves was based on hearsay testimony and (2) the circumstantial evidence did not exclude to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis but that of guilt.
We find that the evidence of the defendant's guilt is substantial and certainly sufficient to support the verdict.
I
Beyond…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Bryant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Crow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pardue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Alldredge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Simas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Waldrop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Gorum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.