Legal Opinion

Trump v. Vance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 9, 2020No. 19-635PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts

*2420In our judicial system, "the public has a right to every man's evidence."1 Since the earliest days of the Republic, "every man" has included the President of the United States. Beginning with Jefferson and carrying on through Clinton, Presidents have uniformly testified or produced documents in criminal proceedings when called upon by federal courts. This case involves-so far as we and the parties can tell-the first state criminal subpoena directed to a President. The President contends that the subpoena is unenforceable. We granted certiorari to decide whether Article II and the Supremacy…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Von BlanckenseeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
  2. Trump v. Mazars USA, LLPSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Trump v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  4. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University v. CIACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  5. Carroll v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API