Walling v. American Rolbal Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The appellant is a corporation- engaged in the manufacture of ball and roller precision bearings and is admittedly subject to the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.
Some time early in November of 1941 a representative of the Wages and Hours Division of the United States Department of Labor visited appellant’s plant and requested permission to inspect its records. This permission was refused. Thereafter, in the same month, an examination was made pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum issued by the administrator and appellant was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- In re HollandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
3Cited by25 opinions
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- In Re Manufacturers Trading Corp. Kiersted v. Hadden (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Hunt Foods and Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- File Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Federal Communications Commission v. CohnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.