State v. Oldroyd
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice.
Stanley Van Oldroyd appeals his conviction of aggravated assault, 1 contending that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury regarding the offense of threatening with a dangerous weapon. 2 Oldroyd argues that threatening with a dangerous weapon is a lesser included offense of aggravated assault and that the court’s refusal to instruct was prejudicial error. We reverse.
In February 1983, Oldroyd and his wife were experiencing marital difficulties and were no longer living together. Mrs. Ol-droyd was living in a basement apartment in Richfield, Utah. About 8:20…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hopper v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State v. BakerUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. CrickUtah Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Charles Verdel FarnsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. FramptonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CamposCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.