Legal Opinion

Downer v. Mellen

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1867Published

APPEAL.from an order made at a special term, denying a motion to set aside a judgment as irregularly entered.

1Opinion of the CourtSutherland, J.

The defendants in this case were nonresidents, and the service of the summons was by publication. Before the time for answering expired, the defendants appeared by attorney, and demanded a copy of the complaint, which the plaintiffs’ attorneys declined to serve. Subsequently, and after the time to answer had expired, on the theory of service by publication, but before the expiration of twenty days from the appearance by attorney, judgment for $20,346.14 was entered in favor of the plaintiffs by the clerk, without notice, and without any application to the court, under subdivision 3 of section…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mackay v. Laidlaw & PondNew York Supreme Court · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API