Legal Opinion

Ruocco v. Mulhall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 5, 2001PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated May 11, 2000, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There are triable issues of fact as to whether the defendant exercised due care to avoid the accident (see, Garner v Fox, 265 AD2d 525; Calico v Phillips, 63 AD2d 955; Lo Giudice v Riedel, 32 AD2d 950; Vehicle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thoma v. RonaiNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Thoma v. RonaiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Garner v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Holt v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Cincotta v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Budget Rent A CarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Dragunova v. DonderoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Sokolovsky v. Mucip, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Charles v. BallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. Parrinello v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API