Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 1, 1989No. C1-88-2261Published

1Opinion of the Court

444 N.W.2d 824 (1989)

STATE of Minnesota, Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

Mark Craig JOHNSON, Respondent.

No. C1-88-2261.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

September 1, 1989.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, State Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Scott Hersey, Isanti County Atty. and Dean E. Emanuel, Asst. Isanti County Atty., Cambridge, for appellant.

Robert Munns, Anoka, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.

YETKA, Justice.

The decisive issue in this case is whether the stop, which led to the arrest and conviction of defendant for driving after revocation, was justified. The district…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API