Legal Opinion

Marek v. Ketyer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 18, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, J.:

¶ 1 This appeal follows a defense verdict in a medical malpractice case in which Appellants alleged that Appellees failed to timely diagnose and treat their infant daughter’s congenital heart condition which led to her death. Upon review we find it necessary to award a new trial based upon Appellants’ claim that Dr. Beerman, a treating physician, communicated with defense counsel ex parte and testified as a defense expert on liability without Appellants’ consent in violation of Pa.R.C.P. 4003.6.

112 Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 4003.6 provides that “[information may be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moses v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Manion v. N.P.W. Medical Center of N.E. Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Vaagen Bros. Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. Pennsylvania State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Rowe v. Vaagen Bros. Lumber Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Alwine v. Sugar Creek Rest, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Mertis, B. v. Dong-Joon, M.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API