Majak v. Starbucks Corporation

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Abuk Majak, No. CV-25-01850-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Starbucks Corporation, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). 16 (Doc. 2). The Court will consider whether Plaintiff should be allowed to proceed in forma 17 pauperis. 18 I. Legal Standards 19 A. Ability to Pay 20 “There is no formula set forth by statute, regulation, or case law to determine when 21 someone is poor enough to earn IFP status.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226,…