Legal Opinion
E360 Insight, Inc. v. Spamhaus Project
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 2, 2011No. 10-3538, 10-3539PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
The last time plaintiff e360 Insight, Inc. came before this court, we affirmed the district court’s entry of default judgment against defendant The Spamhaus Project. All that remained was for e360 to make a reasonable showing of its damages. After a bench trial on the issue, the district court awarded e360 a mere $27,002, a far cry from the millions of dollars that e360 sought. Both parties have appealed. We conclude that the district court properly struck most of e360’s damages evidence, either as an appropriate discovery sanction or for proper procedural reasons, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- E360 INSIGHT v. the Spamhaus ProjectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Diana Packman v. Chicago Tribune Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Front Page News, Incorporated, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Ramirez v. T&H Lemont, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Richard N. Bell v. Cameron TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Susan Spitz v. Proven Winners North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Jan Domanus v. Derek LewickiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Susan Kuttner v. John ZarubaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.